Cosmos and contemplation: gazing at the sky as a practice of amali interpretation

Authors

  • Tri Widarti Universitas Darul Ulum Islamic Centre Soedirman GUPPI
  • Yatmi Universitas Darul Ulum Islamic Centre Sudirman GUPPI
  • Ian Fii Barril Hidayah Universitas Darul Ulum Islamic Centre Sudirman GUPPI
  • Miftachul Mahmud Universitas Darul Ulum Islamic Centre Sudirman GUPPI
  • Farida Ilmiasari Universitas Darul Ulum Islamic Centre Sudirman GUPPI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51468/jpi.v7i2.1018

Keywords:

cosmos, contemplation, practical interpretation, looking at the sky

Abstract

The phenomena of the sky and the cosmos in the Qur'an are not merely present as symbolic or illustrative objects, but rather are epistemic entities that encourage humans to reflect, understand, and deeply feel the presence of God. In the Islamic tradition, the cosmos is known as kitāb manẓūr (the unfolded book), which is the epistemological counterpart of the Qur'an as kitāb manẓūl (the revealed book). The relationship between the two opens up space for an interpretive approach that is not only text-based, but also based on experience and direct contemplation of the universe. This study aims to examine and formulate a model of cosmic amali interpretation, namely an interpretive model based on the contemplative experience of celestial phenomena as a form of appreciation of cosmological verses in the Qur'an. This study uses a qualitative-hermeneutic approach with thematic analysis techniques on the verses of the Qur'an, accompanied by a literature study of classical and contemporary exegetical works, as well as Islamic philosophy. The research results show that cosmic practical interpretation can be constructed through four stages: sensory observation of the sky, rational reflection comparing observations with revelation, spiritual integration with divine values, and the formation of ethical and ecological awareness. This model offers a new approach to the study of thematic interpretation that emphasizes existential and participatory dimensions, where the subject of interpretation not only understands God's verses textually but also internalizes them in a transcendent cosmic experience.

References

Abidin & Muhammad, F. (2020). Ecological Interpretation and Environmental Problems: A Comparative Study of Mujiyono Abdillah & Mudhofir Abdullah. QOF: Journal of Islamic Studies, 4(1), 1-18. doi:https://doi.org/10.30762/qof.v4i1.1990

Al-Ghazālī, A. Ḥ. (2020). Iḥyā' 'Ulūm al-Dīn. Complete translation edition Volume 1. Yogyakarta: Bintang Pustaka Madani.

Al-Khatib, M. A. (2018). Spirituality in Islam: Pathways to God through the Cosmos. Amman, Yordania: Jordanian Institute for Islamic Thought.

Almirzanah, S. (2020). God, humanity and nature: Cosmology in Islamic spirituality. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 76(1), 1-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v76i1.6130

al-Muturidi, S. A. (2007). TheBook of Monotheism: Kitab At Tawheed. Beirut: Darul Kutub Ilmiah (DKi).

Arkoun, M. (1994). Rethinking Islam: Common Questions, Uncommon Answers. Boulder: Westview Press. Diambil kembali dari https://www.proquest.com/openview/2d1f966e5d4fdb95a274cdf2c9acfc89/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=31168

Badri, M. (2018). Contemplation: An Islamic Psychospiritual Study (Edisi Baru). Herndon, VA: International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT). Diambil kembali dari https://iiit.org/wp-content/uploads/Contemplation-New-Edition-Reduced-Complete.pdf

Deki Ridho Anggara et al. (2020). The Description of the Stars in the Qur'an According to Tantawi Jawhari: A Study of Scientific Interpretation. AlI'jaz: Journal of Qur'anic Studies, 5(2), 85-100. doi:https://doi.org/10.53563/ai.v5i2.96

Fazlur Rahman. (1982). Islam and Modernity: Transformation of an Intellectual Tradition. Chicago: Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Febriani. Syahida. & Taufiq, T. (2023). EcoSufism in the Light of the Qur’an: A Thematic Study of Tafsir alMisbah. Teosofia: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Mysticism, 12(1), 119-142. doi:https://doi.org/10.21580/tos.v12i1.17844

Fox et all, K. C. (2016). Is meditation associated with altered brain structure? A systematic review and meta-analysis of morphometric neuroimaging in meditation practitioners. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (Elsevier, Q1 Scopus & Web of Science-indexed), 43(single volume), 48-73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.03.016

Gadamer, H. G. (2004). Truth and Method (2nd ed.). London: Continuum Publishing.

Ibn ʻAjība, A. a.-Ḥ. (1999). AlBaḥr alMadīd fī Tafsīr alQur’ān alMajīd (6 jilid). Kairo: Ḥasan ʻAbbās Zakī.

Ibnu Rusyd. (1986). Faṣl al-Maqāl fī mā bayna al-Sharī‘ah wa al-Ḥikmah min al-Ittiṣāl [The Decisive Treatise]. Beirut: Dār al-Mashriq.

Izutsu, T. (2002). EthicoReligious Concepts in the Qur’ān: The Qur’ān as a Philosophical Text. Montreal: McGillQueen’s University Press.

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Moleong, L. J. (2017). Qualitative Research Methodology. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nasr, S. H. (1993). Religion and the Order of Nature. Oxford University Press: Oxford, England.

He was a Wulandari. (2021). Interpretation of Surah Al-Rahmān Verse 37 on the Phenomenon of the Split Sky: A Review of Science. Semarang: Thesis of UIN Walisongo. Retaken from https://eprints.walisongo.ac.id/id/eprint/14946/

Nursi, B. S. (2010). The Rays: Reflections on Islamic Belief, Thought, Worship and Action (Risalei Nur Collection). Walnut Creek, CA: Tughra Books. I.

Prakoso, T. J. (2020). The Quran and Cosmology: Chronology of the creation and extinction of the Cosmic Realm. Maghza: Journal of Qur'an and Tafsir, 5(1), 17–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.24090/maghza.v5i1.3300

Ryan A. Rahman et al. (note date). Framework for Interpreting Astronomical Verse. Ushuluna: Journal of Ushuluddin Science., 8(1), 45-61. doi: 10.15408/ushuluna.v8i1.29181

Sardar, Z. (2011). Reading the Qur’an: The Contemporary Relevance of the Sacred Text of Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Diambil kembali dari https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Reading_the_Qur_an.html?id=lxgM5RgVoNoC&redir_esc=y

Siti Nur Khasanah. (2015). Shaykh Tantawi Jauhari's Interpretation of Cosmological Verses. Thesis of UIN Sunan Kalijaga. Yogyakarta: Thesis of UIN Sunan Kalijaga. Retaken from https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/15927/

Gratitude. (2022). Cosmocentrism Tafsir QS. As-Shams Verse 16: The Application of Tafsir Ilmi in the Study of Falak. Elfalky: Journal of Astronomy., 6(2), 103-118. doi:https://doi.org/10.24252/ifk.v6i2.34622

Zarkasyi, H. F. (2018, May 9). The Principle of the Relationship of Reason and Revelation according to Ibn Rushd. Taken from Mujahid Dakwah: https://mujahiddakwah.com/2018/05/prinsip-hubungan-akal-dan-wahyu-menurut-ibn-rushd-dr-hamid-fahmy-zarkasyi/

Zed, M. (2004). Literature Research Methods. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Zulfikar et all, E. K. (2018). EcoTheology in Tafsir alAzhar: Hamka’s Efforts in Building a Paradigm and Environmental Awareness. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Quranic Studies (hal. 28-50). Kudus: IAIN Kudus. Diambil kembali dari https://proceeding.iainkudus.ac.id/index.php/ICQS/article/view/422

Downloads

Published

2025-12-28

How to Cite

Tri Widarti, Yatmi, Ian Fii Barril Hidayah, Miftachul Mahmud, & Farida Ilmiasari. (2025). Cosmos and contemplation: gazing at the sky as a practice of amali interpretation. At Turots: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(2), 1571–1580. https://doi.org/10.51468/jpi.v7i2.1018