The Effectiveness of the Integrated Student Teams-Achievement Divisions Learning Method with Active Practice in Improving Cognitive Learning Outcomes of Akhlak Lesson for 10th Grade at SMA Labschool Rawamangun
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51468/jpi.v8i1.1375Keywords:
Student Teams-Achievement Divisions Method, Active Practice, Cognitive Learning Outcomes, Akhlak LessonAbstract
This research originated from field findings indicating that student outcomes had not reached the mastery level, students experienced difficulty understanding the subject of Akhlak, specifically the theme of avoiding Akhlak Mazmumah or disgraceful morals, and the use of teaching methods that were less appropriate or innovative. Consequently, this study aims to examine the effect of implementing the Student Teams-Achievement Divisions learning method based on active practice during the learning process in improving the cognitive learning outcomes of 10th-grade students in the Akhlak subject during the first semester at SMA Labschool Rawamangun. The method used in this research utilized a quantitative approach of the quasi-experimental type with a non-equivalent control group design using a purposive sampling technique. The research sample consisted of 20 students in the experimental class and 15 students in the control class. The research results using the Mann-Whitney U test indicated a significant difference between the learning outcomes of students who received the STAD method treatment integrated with active practice and those without treatment using the direct instruction method commonly used by teachers, with a Sig. (2-tailed) value of 0.000 <0.05. Strengthened by the N-Gain test results, where the experimental class score was 0.65 > 0.30, categorized as medium with an interpretation of moderately effective, and the control class score was 0.28 < 0.30 categorized as low with an interpretation of ineffective. Therefore, H1 is accepted and H0 is rejected, providing treatment using the STAD method integrated with active practice in the experimental class is more effective and has a significant effect in improving students' cognitive learning outcomes compared to the method commonly used by teachers, namely direct instruction in the control class.
References
Alfarisi, N., & Sulaeman, M. (2025). Pengaruh lingkungan sekolah terhadap hasil belajar pendidikan agama Islam pada siswa (Studi survei di sekolah SMA Al-Jihad Jakarta). Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 8(3), 6978–6986. https://doi.org/10.31004/jrpp.v8i3.49307
Alim, P., Sufiyani, S., Muhaemin, S., Fahsin, M., & Rahman, M. N. b. A. (2024). Application of the STAD cooperative model to improve learning outcomes on asmaul husna in islamic education. JIPSI: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sains Islam Interdisipliner, 4(3), 185-192.
Al-Karim, A. H., & Fauzi, A. (2025). The effect of the Quizizz application learning media on student learning outcomes in Fikih Class XI at Madrasah Aliyah Negeri 14 Jakarta. At Turots: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(2), 849–854.https://doi.org/10.51468/jpi.v3i1.56
Anderson, L. W. (2001). A Taxonomy For Learning, Teaching, And Assessing: A Revision Of Bloom’s Taxonomy Of Educational Objectives.
Azani, A., Sarmila, & Gusmaneli. (2024). Hakikat Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Mutiara : Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah, 2(3), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.59059/mutiara.v2i3.1183.
Bahrun, S. M., Ong, E.-T., & Zikri Samngani, M. (2019, April). The Effectiveness Of Cooperative Learning Stad Method (Student Teams-Achievement Division) On The Achievement In Islamic Religious Education. Proceedings of the 8th UPI-UPSI International Conference 2018 (UPI-UPSI 2018). Proceedings of the 8th UPI-UPSI International Conference 2018 (UPI-UPSI 2018), Bandung, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/upiupsi-18.2019.31
Bakar, R. A. (2021). Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian (1 ed.). SUKA-Press UIN Sunan Kalijaga.
Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning.McGraw-Hill Book Company. https://archive.org/details/humancharacteris00benj/page/n10/mode/1up?q=Mastery
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1). School of Education and Human Development, The George Washington University. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED336049.pdf
Fadilah, I., Koderi, & Septuri. (2024). The Cooperative Learning Model of the STAD Type Assisted by Canva and Quizizz Media to Improve Students’ Motivation, Activity, and Learning Outcomes. CV. Creative Tugu Pena, 4(3), 72–79.
Faqih, M. K., Aziz, I., & Hayati, R. M. (2025). The Use of Learning Models Cooperative Learning Type Student Teams Achivement Division (STAD) in Islamic Education Subjects to Increase Learning Motivation. International Journal on Advanced Science, Education, and Religion (IJoASER), 8(2), 204-217.
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74.
Hasibuan, N., Lubis, S. A., & Usiono. (2023). KONSEP PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM DALAM MENINGKATKAN KARAKTER SISWA DI ERA GLOBALISASI PADA MAN 1 PADANGSIDIMPUAN. Edukasi Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 12(4), 669–688. https://doi.org/10.30868/ei.v12i04.8360
Hata, E. J. (2023). Penerapan pembelajaran kooperatif dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar peserta didik pada materi manfaat menghindari penyakit hati di kelas X-D SMA Negeri 1 Suwawa. Al-Mihnah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam dan Keguruan, 2(1), 277–294.
Herdiansyah, T. H., & Kosasih, F. (2025). The Influence of PAI Teachers' Roles on Students' Morals Through the Cooperative Learning Model. At Turots: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(1), 786-795.
Hunain, I., Kodir, A., Kamil, M., Anam, R. C., Maulidia, F., Nafisah, I., Sholihah, J., Ningsih, K. A., Permatasari, N. I., & Kutsiyah, N. (2022). Penerapan Metode Active Learning Pada Pencapaian Akademik Mahasiswa PAI. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 6(2), 126–140.
Isnawan, M. G. (2020). Kuasi Eksperimen (1 ed.). Nashir Al-Kutub Indonesia.
Jannah, E. S. N. (2019). Penerapan Metode Pembelajaran “Active Learning-Small Group Discussion” di Perguruan Tinggi Sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Proses Pembelajaran. Fondatia, 3(2), 19–34.
Khidr, Z. H., & Sabri, W. M. N. (2022). The Impact of STAD Strategy on the Academic Achievement of Eighth-Grade Students in Sciences Subject and Developing their Scientific Trends. Journal of Arts, Literature, Humanities and Social Sciences, 82, 208-239.
Krathwohl, D.R., Bloom, B.S. and Masia, B. B. (1964).Taxonomy of educational objectives, Book II. Affective domain. David McKay Company, Inc.
Kulik, C.-L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1990). Effectiveness of Mastery Learning Programs: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 60(2), 265–299. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060002265
Maulida, N. N., Hikmah, N., & Faelasup. (2025). Analisis Konsep, Nilai, dan Strategi Efektif dalam Implementasi Pendidikan Karakter pada Pembelajaran PAI. JUPERAN: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 4(2), 458–469.
Mendrofa, A. R., Ramadani, H., & Gusmaneli, G. (2024). Penerapan Strategi Active Learning dalam Meningkatkan Pemahaman Materi PAI di Kelas. Aktivisme: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Politik Dan Sosial Indonesia, 2(2), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.62383/aktivisme.v2i2.905
Price, L. R. (2017). Psychometric methods: Theory into practice (Sample chapter: Reliability). Guilford Press. Retrieved from https://www.guilford.com/excerpts/price2.pdf?t=1
Rasyid, F. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Dan Kuantitatif Teori, Metode, Dan Praktek (1 ed.). IAIN Kediri Press.
Rofi'ah, A., Subando, J., & Fatuh W, A. (2023). The Effectiveness of the Talking Chips Type Learning Model in Improving Student Learning Outcomes in the Aqidah Akhlak Subject. At Turots: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(2), 1118-1130.
Rupani, C. M., & Bhutto, M. I. (2011). Evaluation of existing teaching learning process on Bloom’s Taxonomy. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 1(3), 109-118.
Saidah, E. M., & Wahyuni, W. (2026). Enhancing Cognitive and Collaborative Outcomes in Islamic Education: A Classroom Action Research on the STAD Method in Aqidah Akhlak Learning. Asatiza: Jurnal Pendidikan, 7(1), 15-27.
Septiana, M. F., & Khadijah, I. (2025). Effect of Group Resume on Motivation and Learning Outcomes at SDN Perumnas 1 Subang. At Turots: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(1), 770-777.
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice, (2nd Ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Slavin, R. E. (2008). Cooperative Learning, Success for All, and Evidence-based Reform in education. Éducation et Didactique. http://educationdidactique.revues.org.
Sugiarti, T. S., & Fatimah, S. (2023). STEAM pada model PjBL dan hasil belajar koloid peserta didik. Seminar Nasional Dies Natalis 62, 721–730. https://doi.org/10.59562/semnasdies.v1i1.1194.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Supardi. (2015). Penilaian Autentik Pembelajaran Afektif, Kognitif, dan Psikomotorik (Konsep dan Aplikasi). Rajawali Pers.
Syah, M. (2010). Psikologi Pendidikan. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Varera, L., & Jarusalem, M. A. (2018). Pengaruh Faktor Internal dan Eksternal Siswa Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Pengetahuan Bahan Tekstil. Prosiding Pendidikan Teknik Boga Busana, 13.
Yuniarti, D., Gede Surya Abadi, I. B., & Wiyasa, I. K. N. (2019). Pengaruh model Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) berbantuan media mind mapping terhadap hasil belajar IPS siswa kelas V SD Gugus III Kuta Utara Badung tahun ajaran 2017/2018. MIMBAR PGSD Undiksha, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpgsd.v7i1.16970
Yusuf, Y. Q., Natsir, Y., & Hanum, L. (2015). A Teacher's Experience in Teaching with Student Teams-Achievement Division (STAD) Technique. International Journal of Instruction, 8(2), 99-112. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2015.828a.
