The philosophy of thomas kuhn: paradigms and scientific revolutions in islamic scholarship
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51468/jpi.v6i1.334Keywords:
Revolusi Ilmiah, Thomas Kuhn, Konsep Paradigma, Keilmuan IslamAbstract
One of the figures who strongly criticized positivism was Thomas Kuhn. Kuhn criticizes the opinion of positivism which says that science develops cumulatively and evolutionarily. This is then refuted by Kuhn by presenting the concept of scientific paradigm and revolution. The author tries to see the concept of paradigm and scientific revolution in the body of Islamic scholarship. The author uses the library research method in conducting this research. While in collecting data related to the topic discussed by the author using documentation techniques. The results of this study state that the development of science is continuous or can be called continuously evolving. In the course of its evolution, science will experience an old paradigm or a normal phase of science, then enter a period of anomaly and crisis. The end of this cycle is the formation of a new normal science or the birth of a new paradigm. If Thomas Kuhn's thoughts are brought into the context of Islamic scholarship, then at this time it is at the anomaly stage, namely the many differences that occur in understanding a problem. But not until entering the crisis stage which requires finding a new paradigm, this is because each opinion has different arguments and understanding.
References
Almas, A. F. (2018a). Sumbangan Paradigma Thomas S. Kuhn dalam Ilmu dan Pendidikan (Penerapan Metode Problem Based Learning dan Discovery Learning). At-Tarbawi: Jurnal Kajian Kependidikan Islam, 3(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.22515/attarbawi.v3i1.1147
Bagus, L. (1996). Kamus filsafat (Ed. 1). Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Effendi, R. (2020). Revolusi Ilmiah Thomas Kuhn: Perubahan Paradigma dan Implikasi dalam Bangunan Ilmu Keislaman. TAJDID: Jurnal Ilmu Keislaman dan Ushuluddin, 23(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.15548/tajdid.v23i1.1693
Farid, E. K. (2021). Paradigma Dan Revolusi Ilmiah Thomas S. Kuhn Serta Relevansinya Dalam Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman. Kalimah: Jurnal Studi Agama dan Pemikiran Islam, 19(1), 81. https://doi.org/10.21111/klm.v19i1.6367
Fitrianto, I., & Aimmah, S. (2023). Tathwir al-Wasail al-Ta'limiyah fi Ta'lim al-Qashr Muassasan'ala Barnamaj Sketchware. Prosiding Pertemuan Ilmiah Internasional Bahasa Arab, 14(1), 732-740.
Fitrianto, I., Hamid, R., & Mulalic, A. (2023). The effectiveness of the learning strategy" think, talk, write" and snowball for improving learning achievement in lessons insya'at Islamic Boarding School Arisalah. International Journal of Post Axial: Futuristic Teaching and Learning, 13-22.
Fitrianto, I., & Abdillah, F. M. (2018). MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROGAM PEMANTAPAN BAHASA ARAB DAN SHAHSIAH (KEMBARA) KE 4 MAHASISWA KOLEJ UNIVERSITI ISLAM ANTAR BANGSA SELANGOR (KUIS) TAHUN 2018. University of Darussalam Gontor 15-16 September 2018, 121.
Kesuma, U., & Hidayat, A. W. (2020). Pemikiran Thomas S. Kuhn Teori Revolusi Paradigma. Islamadina : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 166–187. https://doi.org/10.30595/islamadina.v0i0.6043
Komarudin, K. (2021). Pradigma dan Revolusi Ilmu Pengetahuan Perspektif Thomas Kuhn. YASIN, 1(2), 321–335. https://doi.org/10.58578/yasin.v1i2.131
Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed). University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, T. S., & Surjaman, T. (1989). Peran paradigma dalam revolusi sains. Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung.
Kurniawan, R., & Rahman, Y. A. (2021). Revolusi Ilmiah: Membedah Paradigma Sains Perspektif Thomas Khun. TSAQOFAH: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.58883/tsaqofah.v5i1.76
Lubis, A. Y. (2015). Filsafat Ilmu: Klasik Hingga Kontemporer. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Putra, A. (2015). EPISTEMOLOGI REVOLUSI ILMIAH THOMAS KUHN DAN RELEVANSINYA BAGI STUDI AL-QUR’AN. Refleksi Jurnal Filsafat dan Pemikiran Islam, 15(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.14421/ref.v15i1.1075
Putri, F. A., & Iskandar, W. (2020). Paradigma Thomas Kuhn: Revolusi Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Pendidikan Fia Alifah Putri, Wahyu Iskandar. Nizhamiyah, 10(2), 94–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.30821/niz.v10i2.779
Rahman, T. (2021). Paradigma Thomas Kuhn dan Relevansinya Terhadap Perkembangan Keilmuan Islam di Indonesia. JURNAL AL-AQIDAH, 13(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.15548/ja.v13i1.2714
Sabila, N. A. (2019). Paradigma dan Revolusi Ilmiah Thomas S. Khun (Aspek Sosiologis, Antropologis, dan Historis dari Ilmu Pengetahuan. Zawiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 5(1), 80–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.31332/zjpi.v5i1.1318
Sahbana, M. D. R. (2022). EPISTIMOLOGI PARADIGMA DAN REVOLUSI ILMU PENGETAHUAN THOMAS KUHN. Kanz Philosophia A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism, 8(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.20871/kpjipm.v8i1.188
Sari, M., & Asmendri, A. (2020). Penelitian Kepustakaan (Library Research) dalam Penelitian Pendidikan IPA. Natural Science, 6(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.15548/nsc.v6i1.1555
Solihin, J. (2021). Transisi Pudarnya Pandemi Covid-19: Dari Masa Normal Baru Ke Masa Normal Normal dalam Paradigma Keilmuan. Rhizome: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Humaniora, 1(5), 12–17.
UIN Sunan Kalijaga, Digarizki, I., Al Anang, A., & Universitas Gadjah Mada. (2020a). Epistemologi Thomas S. Kuhn: Kajian Teori Pergeseran Paradigma dan Revolusi Ilmiah. Jurnal Humanitas: Katalisator Perubahan dan Inovator Pendidikan, 7(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.29408/jhm.v7i1.3285
Ulya, I., & Abid, N. (2015). Pemikiran Thomas Kuhn dan Relevansinya terhadap Keilmuan Islam. Fikrah: Jurnal Ilmu Akidah dan Keagamaan, 3, 249–276. http://dx.doi.org/10.31332/zjpi.v5i1.1318
Verhaak, C., & Haryono Imam, R. (1991). Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan (Cet. 2). Gramedia.
Vilmala, B. K. (2020a). REVOLUSI SAINTIFIK DALAM PERKEMBANGAN MEKANIKA. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 3(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v3i1.22293
Widodo, S. A. (2020). Filsafat Ilmu dan Pendekatan Keilmuan dalam Pendidikan. Idea Press Yogyakarta.
Zubaedi. (2007). Filsafat Barat: Dari Logika Baru Rene Descartes Hingga Revolusi Sains ala Thomas Kuhn. Ar-Ruzz Media.
