Characteristics of Islamic religious education assessment instruments

Authors

  • Rini Mulyani Pascasarjana Institut Agama Islam Pontianak, Indonesia
  • Karimullah Pascasarjana Institut Agama Islam Pontianak, Indonesia
  • Wahab Pascasarjana Institut Agama Islam Pontianak, Indonesia
  • Sahrul Sobirin Pascasarjana Institut Agama Islam Pontianak, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51468/jpi.v6i1.439

Keywords:

Characteristics Assessment, Instrument Islamic, Religious Education

Abstract

Validity, Reliability, Differentiation, Level of difficulty is an important instrument in education so that the data generated can be used properly. Validation is divided into validation of a content, construct. Content validation is an instrument that can be said to be valid if it is in accordance with the curriculum, material and objectives. While construct validity is validity that thinks how the achievement of test items can measure something that will be measured and adjusted to the concepts that have been set. Reliability is determined by the Cronbach's alpha value, if the Cronbach's alpha value of 0.5 can be used for research purposes. Differentiating ability distinguishes the upper and lower groups in the form of questions. The level of difficulty distinguishes questions in terms of difficulty.

References

Afifatun. (2018). Perencanaan Sistem Evaluasi Pendidikan. CV. LADUNY ALIFATAMA.

Ali, M. (2022). Optimalisasi Kompetensi Kepribadian Dan Profesionalisme Guru Pendidikan Agama Islam dalam Mengajar. Ar-Rusy, 100-121.

Allen. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Mexico: Cole Publishing Company.

Arikunto. (2013). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Basuki, H. (2014). Asesemen Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT.Remaja Rosdakarya.

Daryanto, A. (2013). Evaluasi dan Penilaian Pembelajaran Kurikulum. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.

Depag. (2007). Mushaf Alquran dan Terjemahan. Jakarta: Alquran Pentashihan Departemen Agama RI.

Elviana. (2020). ANALISIS BUTIR SOAL EVALUASI PEMBELAJARAN PAI PROGRAM ANATES. Jurnal Mudarrisuna, 58-74.

Erlinawati, M. (2021). Test Validity and Reliabity In Learning Evaluation. Bulletin of Community Engagment, 1-7.

Hariyati T, Z. (2019). VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF PERFOMANCE ASSESSMENT. JURNAL LITERASIOLOGI, 100-107.

Hikmah, M. (2021). Validitas dan Realibitas Tes dalam menunjang Hasil Belajar PAI. Vol I.

Khafidin. (2014). Analisis Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Tes Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Tingkat SMA. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Islam, 253–266.

Mardapi. (2016). Pengukuran Penilaian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: UIN Yogyakarta.

Retnawati. (2014). Membuktikan validitas Insturmen Pengukuran. Jakarta: UI Press.

Sutrisno Hadi, Metodelogi Research, Andi Offset, Yogyakarta, 2002

Sugiyono. (2019). Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabete.

Sulaiman. (2017). Metodologi Pembelajaran PAI. Banda Aceh: Yayasan Pena Banda Aceh.

Sunawan, D. H. (2017). Classroom Engagement. Atlantis Press, 50-82.

Sundayana. (2016). Statistika Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Surapranata. (2004). Analisis, validitas, reliabilitas, dan interpretasihasil tes implementasi kurikulum 2004. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Suryadi, A. (2020). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: CV. Jejak.

Widiyanto. (2018). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Madiun: UNIPMA PRESS.

Yusup. (2018). Uji Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian. Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 1-7.

Zogara, A. u. (2021). MEMAHAMI DASAR-DASAR PENELITIAN KESEHATAN. In Haura Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-25

How to Cite

Mulyani, R., Karimullah, Wahab, & Sahrul Sobirin. (2024). Characteristics of Islamic religious education assessment instruments. At Turots: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 6(1), 250–258. https://doi.org/10.51468/jpi.v6i1.439