E Analisis kepuasan mahasiswa terhadap pelayanan akademik Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Tarbiyah Madani Yogyakarta (Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA))
Analisis kepuasan mahasiswa terhadap pelayanan akademik Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Tarbiyah Madani Yogyakarta (Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA))
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51468/jpi.v3i2.71Keywords:
Kepuasan Mahasiswa STITMA Yogyakarta Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA)Abstract
Service quality is a major concern in the management of higher education institutions. This is because the quality of higher education can be measured by the quality of service to students. In addition, the government also emphasizes to improve public services, one of which is administrative and academic services in educational institutions. The purpose of this study was to determine the factors that dominate student satisfaction. The population of this study were students at STIT Madani Yogyakarta with a total sample of 95 students. This analysis uses Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The dominant factor in the construct of student satisfaction is assurance and the weakest factor is reliability. The indicator that dominates the assurance dimension is the clarity of information about administrative and academic service procedures. Speed and alertness are needed to improve the quality of administrative and academic services at STIT Madani Yogyakarta.
References
Ayu, I. G., Srinadi, M., & Eka, P. (n.d.). Faktor-Faktor Penentu Kepuasan Mahasiswa Terhadap Pelayanan Fakultas Sebagai Lembaga Pendidikan (Studi Kasus di FMIPA, Universitas Udayana). 217–231.
Bhakti, Y. B., & Rahmawati, E. Y. (2018). Indeks Kepuasan Mahasiswa terhadap Pelayanan Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 7(3).
Boky, Y. (2016). Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Mahasiswa Terhadap Pelayanan Akademik Sekolah Tinggi Theologia Jaffray Makassar. Jurnal Jaffray, 14(2), 269–290.
Emerson, R. W. (2015). Convenience Sampling, Random Sampling, and Snowball Sampling: How Does Sampling Affect the Validity of Research? Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 109(2), 164–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1510900215
Kurbani, A. (2016). Pengaruh Kualitas Layanan Akademik Dan Fasilitas Pendidikan Terhadap Kepuasan Mahasiswa (Adie Kurbanie). 22–35.
Lombone, I., Paendong, M. S., & Langi, Y. (2012). Tingkat Kepuasan Mahasiswa Terhadap Kualitas Pelayanan Universitas Sam Ratulangi Menggunakan Analisis Faktor. Jurnal MIPA Unstrat, 1(1), 52–56.
Marthalina. (2018). Analisis kualitas pelayanan akademik dan kepuasan mahasiswa di IPDN kampus Jakarta. 5, 1–18.
Msc., D. A. D. (2012). Perguruan tinggi yang berkualitas merupakan bagian dari konsep kemandirian. 1–3.
Nempung, T., Setiyaningsih, T., & Syamsiah, N. (2015). Otomatisasi Metode Penelitian Skala Likert Berbasis Web. November, 1–8.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: Multiple- Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perception of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.
RAKASIWI, L. (2015). “Analisis Kualitas Pelayanan Akademik Dan Ketersediaan Sarana Akademik Biro Administrasi Akademik Terhadap Kepuasan Mahasiswa Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta”. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Sari, R. P., & Komarudin, A. (2021). Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) Model for Testing Normality with the Weight Least Square (WLS) Estimation Method. Sainstek : Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi, 13(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.31958/js.v13i1.3169
Shabri, I., & Yanti, R. (2020). Analisis Kepuasan Mahasiswa Terhadap Pelayanan Akademik Prodi Sastra Inggris Universitas Dharma Andalas Padang. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi Bisnis, 2(1), 51–56.
UIN Medan, L. (2016). Laporan Kepuasan Mahasiswa Terhadap Layanan Akademik UIN Sumatra Utara Medan.
