The challenges of internalizing religious moderation values amid the rise of socio-political polarization

Authors

  • Muhamad Najib Aulia Zaman Institut Islam Nahdlatul Ulama Temanggung, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Syakur Institut Islam Nahdlatul Ulama Temanggung, Indonesia
  • Joni Institut Islam Nahdlatul Ulama Temanggung, Indonesia
  • Muh. Baehaqi Institut Islam Nahdlatul Ulama Temanggung, Indonesia
  • Sumarjoko Institut Islam Nahdlatul Ulama Temanggung, Indonesia
  • Husna Nashihin Institut Islam Nahdlatul Ulama Temanggung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51468/jpi.v6i1.1380

Keywords:

Islamic Education, . Islamic Education Learning, Character

Abstract

Religious-based socio-political polarization is one of the main challenges in strengthening social cohesion and religious life in post-reform Indonesia. The increasing politicization of religious identity in the lead-up to the 2024 elections demonstrates that religion serves not only as a source of moral values but also as an instrument of political mobilization that has the potential to threaten moderation and tolerance among religious communities. This study aims to analyze the relationship between socio-political polarization and the internalization of religious moderation in Indonesia, values in the context of a politically and ideologically fragmented society.

Data were gathered from 25 participants—religious leaders, academics, civil society activists, and young voters from five provinces—through in-depth interviews, observations, and document analysis using a qualitative approach with a phenomenological design. With the aid of NVivo 14 software, thematic approaches were used to analyze the data. The findings show that while religious moderation is still symbolic and has not yet fully ingrained itself in society's social consciousness, religious polarization is strengthened by the use of social media as a platform for political identity fights. The participation of interfaith leaders, religious digital literacy, and intercultural education are important elements that promote moderation; algorithmic media bias and political fragmentation are important obstacles.

References

Anshori, M. (2021). Religious moderation in education: Challenges and implementation in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Studies, 12(3), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.18326/jis.v12i3.211

Fadli, R., & Setiawan, M. (2023). Digital polarization and religious moderation: Social media narratives in Indonesia. SAGE Open, 13(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231112210

Hidayat, A. (2022). Moderasi beragama sebagai kebijakan publik: Antara idealisme dan realitas. Jurnal Sosial Politik Indonesia, 5(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.22146/jspi.78231

Laclau, E. (2005). On Populist Reason. Verso.

Lim, M. (2020). Freedom to hate: Social media, algorithmic enclaves, and the rise of tribal nationalism in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 52(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2020.1700629

Parekh, B. (2006). Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. Palgrave Macmillan.

Pew Research Center. (2023). Global restrictions on religion. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion

Rahman, F., & Nurdiansyah, D. (2022). Polarization and identity politics in post-reform Indonesia. Asian Journal of Political Science, 30(4), 561–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2022.2056943

Wahid Institute. (2022). Laporan indeks toleransi Indonesia 2022. https://wahidinstitute.org

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Putri, E. F., & Manik, K. U. (2024). Religious moderation in anticipation of religious politicization ahead of the 2024 election. Journal of Current Research in Social Sciences, 5(2), 55–70. https://ejournal.hakhara-institute.com/MPSS/article/view/16

Supandi, S., & Aini, K. (2025). The role of Islamic education in building religious moderation in the era of social polarization and digital politics. Al-Ulum Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Keislaman, 25(1), 120–140. https://journal.uim.ac.id/index.php/alulum/article/view/3522

Zaimina, A. B. (2025). Addressing digital religious polarization: Policy analysis of religious moderation narratives on Indonesian government social media. Al’Adalah Journal, 22(1), 33–48. https://www.aladalah.lppmuinkhas.com/aladalah/article/view/572

Khotimah, S. (2023). Youth and religious tolerance in Indonesia: The role of digital education. Journal of Contemporary Islam Studies, 14(2), 88–105. https://jcis.uinjkt.ac.id/article/view/2115

Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation.

Putri, E. F., & Manik, K. U. (2024). Religious moderation in anticipation of religious politicization ahead of the 2024 election. Journal of Current Research in Social Sciences, 5(2), 55–70. https://ejournal.hakhara-institute.com/MPSS/article/view/16

Supandi, S., & Aini, K. (2025). The role of Islamic education in building religious moderation in the era of social polarization and digital politics. Al-Ulum Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Keislaman, 25(1), 120–140. https://journal.uim.ac.id/index.php/alulum/article/view/3522

Zaimina, A. B. (2025). Addressing digital religious polarization: Policy analysis of religious moderation narratives on Indonesian government social media. Al’Adalah Journal, 22(1), 33–48. https://www.aladalah.lppmuinkhas.com/aladalah/article/view/572

Hadiz, V. R. (2020). Populism and Islamic politics in Indonesia: Religious identity and class interests. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 50(2), 270–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2019.1665183

Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. Verso.

Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation.

Mietzner, M. (2021). Political polarization in Indonesia: Lessons from the 2019 presidential election. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 57(2), 157–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2020.1855405

Nisa, E. F. (2023). Digital Islam and youth religiosity in Indonesia: Between conservatism and progressivism. Religion, State & Society, 51(3), 212–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637494.2023.2205142

Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin Press.

Parekh, B. (2006). Rethinking multiculturalism: Cultural diversity and political theory. Palgrave Macmillan.

Putri, E. F., & Manik, K. U. (2024). Religious moderation in anticipation of religious politicization ahead of the 2024 election. Journal of Current Research in Social Sciences, 5(2), 55–70. https://ejournal.hakhara-institute.com/MPSS/article/view/16

Supandi, S., & Aini, K. (2025). The role of Islamic education in building religious moderation in the era of social polarization and digital politics. Al-Ulum Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Keislaman, 25(1), 120–140. https://journal.uim.ac.id/index.php/alulum/article/view/3522

Zaimina, A. B. (2025). Addressing digital religious polarization: Policy analysis of religious moderation narratives on Indonesian government social media. Al’Adalah Journal, 22(1), 33–48. https://www.aladalah.lppmuinkhas.com/aladalah/article/view/572

Downloads

Published

2026-01-03

How to Cite

Muhamad Najib Aulia Zaman, Muhammad Syakur, Joni, Muh. Baehaqi, Sumarjoko, & Husna Nashihin. (2026). The challenges of internalizing religious moderation values amid the rise of socio-political polarization. At Turots: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 6(1), 625–631. https://doi.org/10.51468/jpi.v6i1.1380

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 Juni (2024): At Turots: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 > >>