Development of an Evaluation Instrument for Attitude and Skills in Islamic Religious Education for Senior High School Students (Phase E).
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51468/jpi.v8i1.1492Keywords:
Attitude Assessment, Islamic Religious Education, Skill Assessment, Instrument ValidationAbstract
Evaluation in Islamic Religious Education (PAI) at the senior high school level should assess not only cognitive achievement but also students’ attitudes and skills as part of authentic assessment in the Merdeka Curriculum. However, teachers often face difficulties in conducting objective affective and psychomotor assessments due to the lack of structured and validated instruments. This study aims to develop and examine the feasibility of an evaluation instrument for assessing attitudes and skills in Islamic Religious Education for Phase E senior high school students. This study employed a Research and Development approach using the ADDIE model. Data were collected through curriculum analysis, expert validation, and limited field testing. The development process included designing assessment indicators, constructing instrument items and rubrics, revising based on expert feedback, and conducting limited trials. The results show that the developed attitude and skills evaluation instruments are feasible for use. Expert validation results indicated a very good level of validity, while limited field trials showed that the attitude instrument was categorized as very good and the skills instrument as good. Therefore, the developed instruments can be used as structured and authentic tools to evaluate affective and psychomotor learning outcomes in Islamic Religious Education at the senior high school level.
References
Anafi, I., Suryadi, A., & Supriatna, N. (2021). Development of educational products using the ADDIE model: A systematic review. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 5(2), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v5i2.34121
Coussens, A. H., Lee, J., & Smith, R. (2022). Writing and structuring research articles for international journals. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 53(4), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.53.4.03
Fadillah, M., & Kurniawan, D. (2022). Authentic assessment in Islamic Religious Education: Challenges and practices in senior high schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 11(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpi.2022.11104
Fauzan, A., & Anwar, S. (2022). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian sikap dalam pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam. Tarbawi: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.32678/tarbawi.v7i2.5123
Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Capaian pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Budi Pekerti SMA/SMK Fase E. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Kemendikbudristek. (2023). Panduan asesmen pada Kurikulum Merdeka. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Lisnawati, S. (2018). Model evaluasi CIPP dalam pembelajaran pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 9(1), 15–27.
Maulidya Nisa, F., Rahman, A., & Hidayat, T. (2024). Self-determination theory in Islamic education assessment: Implications for student motivation. International Journal of Islamic Educational Psychology, 5(1), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.18196/ijiep.v5i1.17892
Mulyasa, E. (2021). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka dan asesmen autentik. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nurhayati, S., & Abdullah, I. (2021). Affective domain assessment in Islamic education learning. Journal of Islamic Education Studies, 6(2), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.21580/jies.2021.6.2.6945
Rahmawati, L., & Wahyuni, S. (2023). Developing observation rubrics for psychomotor assessment in religious education. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 17(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.17509/jci.v17i1.50211
Ridwan, M., & Syamsuddin. (2020). Research and development methods in educational assessment. Journal of Educational Methodology, 4(3), 211–220.
Sugiyono. (2020). Metode penelitian dan pengembangan (Research and Development). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Syarifuddin. (2023). Evaluasi sikap dan keterampilan dalam pembelajaran PAI berbasis Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 20(2), 177–190.
8 Author 1 et.al (First phrase of tittle …)
Author 1 et.al (First phrase of tittle …) 8
10.51468/jpi.v3i1.56 [email protected] 8
At Turots: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam ISSN 2747-089X
Vol. 6, No. 1, Juni 2024, pp. 110-119
At Turots: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam ISSN 2747-089X
Vol. 6, No. 2, December 2024, pp. xxx-xxx
At Turots: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam
Vol. x, No. x, December 2024, pp. xxx-xxx
Print ISSN : 2656-7555 || Online ISSN : 2747-089X
http://journal.stitmadani.ac.id/index.php/JPI/index
https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.2023.20206
Ulfah, M., & Lisnawati, S. (2018). Evaluasi pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam menggunakan model CIPP. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(1), 33–46.
Wijaya, R. (2023). Problematika penilaian afektif dan psikomotor dalam pembelajaran PAI di SMA. Jurnal Studi Pendidikan Islam, 6(1), 71–84.
Zainuddin, M., & Karim, A. (2021). Authentic assessment implementation in Islamic education classrooms. Al-Ta’lim Journal, 28(2), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.15548/jt.v28i2.674Hidayat, T., & Syafe’i, I. (2022). Penguatan asesmen karakter dalam Pendidikan Agama Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 12(2), 201–214.
Pratama, A., & Fauzi, M. (2020). Validity and reliability testing of educational assessment instruments. Journal of Educational Measurement, 4(1), 1–13.
Rahman, F., & Kholis, N. (2021). Assessment of religious skills in Islamic education. Journal of Islamic Learning, 9(2), 119–130.
Sari, D. P., & Anugrah, R. (2022). Development of Likert-scale instruments in affective assessment. Journal of Educational Research, 15(3), 245–258.
Setiawan, A., & Mahmud, M. (2023). Project-based learning to enhance religious creativity in PAI. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Islam, 4(2), 88–101.
Yusuf, M., & Hamzah, A. (2020). Psychomotor assessment in secondary education. International Journal of Educational Assessment, 2(1), 33–47.
Zulkifli, Z., & Nasution, S. (2024). Digital da’wah as religious creativity in Islamic education. Journal of Islamic Education and Technology, 3(1), 1–14.
